[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4050a32c-c0dd-32d5-04f0-243e70e929af@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:29:00 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jaedon.shin@...il.com, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm: Restore registration print with %pOF
On 26/04/2019 18:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/20/19 12:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> It is useful to print which interrupt controllers are registered in the
>> system and which parent IRQ they use, especially given that L2 interrupt
>> controllers do not call request_irq() on their parent interrupt and do
>> not appear under /proc/interrupts for that reason.
>>
>> We used to print the base register address virtual address which had
>> little value, use %pOF to print the path to the Device Tree node which
>> maps to the physical address more easily and is what people need to
>> troubleshoot systems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>
> Marc, are you okay with taking that patch?
I find it slightly pointless, but if you find it useful in the field,
fair enough. I've queued it for 5.2.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists