[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20443fd3-bd1e-9472-8ca3-e3014e59f249@solarflare.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:00:06 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: ib: force endiannes annotation
On 29/04/2019 07:09, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_recv.c b/net/rds/ib_recv.c
> index 7055985..a070a2d 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_recv.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_recv.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static void rds_ib_cong_recv(struct rds_connection *conn,
> }
>
> /* the congestion map is in little endian order */
> - uncongested = le64_to_cpu(uncongested);
> + uncongested = le64_to_cpu((__force __le64)uncongested);
>
> rds_cong_map_updated(map, uncongested);
> }
Again, a __force cast doesn't seem necessary here. It looks like the
code is just using the wrong types; if all of src, dst and uncongested
were __le64 instead of uint64_t, and the last two lines replaced with
rds_cong_map_updated(map, le64_to_cpu(uncongested)); then the semantics
would be kept with neither sparse errors nor __force.
__force is almost never necessary and mostly just masks other bugs or
endianness confusion in the surrounding code. Instead of adding a
__force, either fix the code to be sparse-clean or leave the sparse
warning in place so that future developers know there's something not
right.
-Ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists