[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8c032b3-a0be-1710-3ec3-cc3b0b1aaa67@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:11:51 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems
On 29. 04. 19, 13:55, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Well, I could have used first_node. But I am not sure, if the first
> POSSIBLE node is also ONLINE during boot?
Thinking about it, it does not matter, actually. Both first_node and
first_online are allocated and set up, no matter which one is ONLINE
node. So first_node should work as good as first_online_node.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists