[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190429122210.GB32474@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:22:10 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: ib: force endiannes annotation
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:02:31PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> ... are some bitwise ops on the values (bitwise ops are legal in any
> endianness) and incrementation of the pointers (which cares only about
> the pointee size, not type).
Oh, true. That is why the underlying annotation is called __bitwise :)
I'll take my previous comment back.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists