[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq11s1l0z7r.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:31:52 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lsf@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF/MM] Preliminary agenda ? Anyone ... anyone ? Bueller ?
James,
> But for this year, I'd just assume the "event partners" checkbox
> covers publication of attendee data to attendees, because if you
> assume the opposite, since you've asked no additional permission of
> your speakers either, that would make publishing the agenda a GDPR
> violation.
Speakers have proposed a topic by posting a message to a public mailing
list. Whereas not all attendees have indicated their desire to attend in
a public forum.
I don't think there's a problem publishing the list of people that sent
an ATTEND. My concern is the ones that didn't. And if the attendee list
is not comprehensive, I am not sure how helpful it is.
>From a more practical perspective, I also don't have access to whether
people clicked the "event partners" box or not during registration.
Although I can reach out to LF and see whether I can get access to that
information.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists