linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] dmaengine: sprd: Add device validation to support multiple controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190429140537.GN3845@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:35:37 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, eric.long@...soc.com,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dmaengine: sprd: Add device validation to support
 multiple controllers

On 29-04-19, 20:20, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 19:57, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 15-04-19, 20:14, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > From: Eric Long <eric.long@...soc.com>
> > >
> > > Since we can support multiple DMA engine controllers, we should add
> > > device validation in filter function to check if the correct controller
> > > to be requested.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Long <eric.long@...soc.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c |    5 +++++
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > index 0f92e60..9f99d4b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > @@ -1020,8 +1020,13 @@ static void sprd_dma_free_desc(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
> > >  static bool sprd_dma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> > >  {
> > >       struct sprd_dma_chn *schan = to_sprd_dma_chan(chan);
> > > +     struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec =
> > > +             container_of(param, struct of_phandle_args, args[0]);
> > >       u32 slave_id = *(u32 *)param;
> > >
> > > +     if (chan->device->dev->of_node != dma_spec->np)
> >
> > Are you not using of_dma_find_controller() that does this, so this would
> > be useless!
> 
> Yes, we can use of_dma_find_controller(), but that will be a little
> complicated than current solution. Since we need introduce one
> structure to save the node to validate in the filter function like
> below, which seems make things complicated. But if you still like to
> use of_dma_find_controller(), I can change to use it in next version.

Sorry I should have clarified more..

of_dma_find_controller() is called by xlate, so you already run this
check, so why use this :)

-- 
~Vinod