linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] net-next: stmmac: add mdio clause 45 access from mac device for dwmac4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B46E5B4@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:19:16 +0000
From:   Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
        Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "yt.shen@...iatek.com" <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
        "jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com" <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com>,
        "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
        "Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] net-next: stmmac: add mdio clause 45 access from
 mac device for dwmac4

From: Ong, Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 16:15:42

> What is the preference of the driver maintainer here?  

Your implementation doesn't need the mdelay() so I think we should follow 
your way once you also address the review comments from Andrew and me.

Maybe you can coordinate with Biao and submit a C45 implementation that 
can be tested by both ?

Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu