linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190429184439.68049050@nic.cz>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:44:39 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia)

On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:37:53 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:

> On Mon 2019-04-29 17:38:42, Marek Behun wrote:
> > I am sending patch only adding the I2C dep. Theoretically it is
> > possible that someone uses the same I2C API in their microcontroller on
> > another architecture.  
> 
> Theoretically. But we both now that probability of that is very low,
> and that likely driver would need other updates, too... right?
> 
> 								Pavel

What would be the benefit to add ARM dependency? So that distro
compilations don't ship the turris_omnia driver unnecesarily?