lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:51:40 +0200
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <>
To:     Pavel Machek <>, Marek Behun <>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia)

On 29.04.19 18:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Theoretically. But we both now that probability of that is very low,
>>> and that likely driver would need other updates, too... right?
>> What would be the benefit to add ARM dependency? So that distro
>> compilations don't ship the turris_omnia driver unnecesarily?
> That, and so that people are not asked "do you want to enable omnia
> LEDs?" when they update their kernel on i386.

Is that controller only built-in into some SoCs, or also available
as a separate chip ?


Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering -- +49-151-27565287

Powered by blists - more mailing lists