lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:51:40 +0200
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia)

On 29.04.19 18:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Theoretically. But we both now that probability of that is very low,
>>> and that likely driver would need other updates, too... right?
>>
>> What would be the benefit to add ARM dependency? So that distro
>> compilations don't ship the turris_omnia driver unnecesarily?
> 
> That, and so that people are not asked "do you want to enable omnia
> LEDs?" when they update their kernel on i386.

Is that controller only built-in into some SoCs, or also available
as a separate chip ?

--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287

Powered by blists - more mailing lists