| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190429204040.18725-1-dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:40:40 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, heiko@...ech.de,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, briannorris@...omium.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...il.com>,
mka@...omium.org, ryandcase@...omium.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: dw_mmc: Disable SDIO interrupts while suspended to fix suspend/resume
Processing SDIO interrupts while dw_mmc is suspended (or partly
suspended) seems like a bad idea. We really don't want to be
processing them until we've gotten ourselves fully powered up.
You might be wondering how it's even possible to become suspended when
an SDIO interrupt is active. As can be seen in
dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(), we explicitly keep dw_mmc out of runtime
suspend when the SDIO interrupt is enabled. ...but even though we
stop normal runtime suspend transitions when SDIO interrupts are
enabled, the dw_mci_runtime_suspend() can still get called for a full
system suspend.
Let's handle all this by explicitly masking SDIO interrupts in the
suspend call and unmasking them later in the resume call. To do this
cleanly I'll keep track of whether the client requested that SDIO
interrupts be enabled so that we can reliably restore them regardless
of whether we're masking them for one reason or another.
It should be noted that if dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq() is never called
(for instance, if we don't have an SDIO card plugged in) that
"client_sdio_enb" will always be false. In those cases this patch
adds a tiny bit of overhead to suspend/resume (a spinlock and a
read/write of INTMASK) but other than that is a no-op. The
SDMMC_INT_SDIO bit should always be clear and clearing it again won't
hurt.
Without this fix it can be seen that rk3288-veyron Chromebooks with
Marvell WiFi would sometimes fail to resume WiFi even after picking my
recent mwifiex patch [1]. Specifically you'd see messages like this:
mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: Firmware wakeup failed
mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: PREP_CMD: FW in reset state
...and tracing through the resume code in the failing cases showed
that we were processing a SDIO interrupt really early in the resume
call.
NOTE: downstream in Chrome OS 3.14 and 3.18 kernels (both of which
support the Marvell SDIO WiFi card) we had a patch ("CHROMIUM: sdio:
Defer SDIO interrupt handling until after resume") [2]. Presumably
this is the same problem that was solved by that patch.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190404040106.40519-1-dianders@chromium.org
[2] https://crrev.com/c/230765
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.14.x
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
I didn't put any "Fixes" tag here, but presumably this could be
backported to whichever kernels folks found it useful for. I have at
least confirmed that kernels v4.14 and v4.19 (as well as v5.1-rc2)
show the problem. It is very easy to pick this to v4.19 and it
definitely fixes the problem there.
I haven't spent the time to pick this to 4.14 myself, but presumably
it wouldn't be too hard to backport this as far as v4.13 since that
contains commit 32dba73772f8 ("mmc: dw_mmc: Convert to use
MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD for SDIO IRQs"). Prior to that it might
make sense for anyone experiencing this problem to just pick the old
CHROMIUM patch to fix them.
Changes in v2:
- Suggested 4.14+ in the stable tag (Sasha-bot)
- Extra note that this is a noop on non-SDIO (Shawn / Emil)
- Make boolean logic cleaner as per https://crrev.com/c/1586207/1
- Hopefully clear comments as per https://crrev.com/c/1586207/1
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 80dc2fd6576c..480067b87a94 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,8 @@ static void dw_mci_init_card(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_card *card)
}
}
-static void __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, int enb)
+static void __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool enb,
+ bool client_requested)
{
struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
unsigned long irqflags;
@@ -1672,6 +1673,20 @@ static void __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, int enb)
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
+ /*
+ * If we're being called directly from dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq()
+ * (which means that the client driver actually wants to enable or
+ * disable interrupts) then save the request. Otherwise this
+ * wasn't directly requested by the client and we should logically
+ * AND it with the client request since we want to disable if
+ * _either_ the client disabled OR we have some other reason to
+ * disable temporarily.
+ */
+ if (client_requested)
+ host->client_sdio_enb = enb;
+ else
+ enb &= host->client_sdio_enb;
+
/* Enable/disable Slot Specific SDIO interrupt */
int_mask = mci_readl(host, INTMASK);
if (enb)
@@ -1688,7 +1703,7 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
- __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, enb);
+ __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, enb, true);
/* Avoid runtime suspending the device when SDIO IRQ is enabled */
if (enb)
@@ -1701,7 +1716,7 @@ static void dw_mci_ack_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc)
{
struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
- __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, 1);
+ __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, true, false);
}
static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
@@ -2734,7 +2749,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (pending & SDMMC_INT_SDIO(slot->sdio_id)) {
mci_writel(host, RINTSTS,
SDMMC_INT_SDIO(slot->sdio_id));
- __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, 0);
+ __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(slot, false, false);
sdio_signal_irq(slot->mmc);
}
@@ -3424,6 +3439,8 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct dw_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(host->slot, false, false);
+
if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
host->dma_ops->exit(host);
@@ -3490,6 +3507,8 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
/* Now that slots are all setup, we can enable card detect */
dw_mci_enable_cd(host);
+ __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(host->slot, true, false);
+
return 0;
err:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
index 46e9f8ec5398..dfbace0f5043 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
* @cmd11_timer: Timer for SD3.0 voltage switch over scheme.
* @cto_timer: Timer for broken command transfer over scheme.
* @dto_timer: Timer for broken data transfer over scheme.
+ * @client_sdio_enb: The value last passed to enable_sdio_irq.
*
* Locking
* =======
@@ -234,6 +235,8 @@ struct dw_mci {
struct timer_list cmd11_timer;
struct timer_list cto_timer;
struct timer_list dto_timer;
+
+ bool client_sdio_enb;
};
/* DMA ops for Internal/External DMAC interface */
--
2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists