[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190430160813.GI13796@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:08:13 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] proc/sysctl: add shared variables for range check
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:42:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:47 AM Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:26 AM Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add a const int array containing the most commonly used values,
> > > some macros to refer more easily to the correct array member,
> > > and use them instead of creating a local one for every object file.
> > >
> >
> > Ok it seems that this simply can't be done, because there are at least
> > two points where extra1,2 are set to a non const struct:
> > in ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl() it's assigned to struct netns_ipvs,
> > while in mpls_dev_sysctl_register() it's assigned to a struct mpls_dev
> > and a struct net.
>
> Why can't these be converted to const also? I don't see the pointer
> changing anywhere. They're created in one place and never changed.
That's not true; I thought the same thing, but you need to see how
they're used in the functions they're called.
proc_do_defense_mode(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = table->extra2;
update_defense_level(ipvs);
static void update_defense_level(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
spin_lock(&ipvs->dropentry_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists