[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b31d4f2e-8756-02ef-9c0b-55c7e755c097@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:33:21 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] io_uring: free allocated io_memory once
On 4/30/19 10:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> If io_allocate_scq_urings() fails to allocate an sq_* region, it will
> call io_mem_free() for any previously allocated regions, but leave
> dangling pointers to these regions in the ctx. Any regions which have
> not yet been allocated are left NULL. Note that when returning
> -EOVERFLOW, the previously allocated sq_ring is not freed, which appears
> to be an unintentional leak.
>
> When io_allocate_scq_urings() fails, io_uring_create() will call
> io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(), which calls io_mem_free() on all the sq_*
> regions, assuming the pointers are valid and not NULL.
>
> This can result in pages being freed multiple times, which has been
> observed to corrupt the page state, leading to subsequent fun. This can
> also result in virt_to_page() on NULL, resulting in the use of bogus
> page addresses, and yet more subsequent fun. The latter can be detected
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL on arm64.
>
> Adding a cleanup path to io_allocate_scq_urings() complicates the logic,
> so let's leave it to io_ring_ctx_free() to consistently free these
> pointers, and simplify the io_allocate_scq_urings() error paths.
Looks good - applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists