[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190430165817.GB29626@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:58:17 +0200
From: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, Li Jun <jun.li@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] phy: Add driver for mixel mipi dphy found on
NXP's i.MX8 SoCs
Hi Fabio,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:24:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:40 AM Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org> wrote:
> >
> > This adds support for the Mixel DPHY as found on i.MX8 CPUs but since
> > this is an IP core it will likely be found on others in the future. So
> > instead of adding this to the nwl host driver make it a generic PHY
> > driver.
> >
> > The driver supports the i.MX8MQ. Support for i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP can be
> > added once the necessary system controller bits are in via
> > mixel_dphy_devdata.
> >
> > Co-authored-by: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
>
> I wish I could test it on a imx8m-evk , but there are some other
> pieces needed such as Northwest Logic driver, mxsfb changes for
> supporting mx8m, OLED panel driver, etc
>
> Anyway, it looks good to me and I have only a few minor comments:
>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig | 11 +
> > drivers/phy/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8-mipi-dphy.c | 506 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 518 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8-mipi-dphy.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig
> > index 832670b4952b..a111b130f9d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig
> > @@ -3,3 +3,14 @@ config PHY_FSL_IMX8MQ_USB
> > depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
> > select GENERIC_PHY
> > default ARCH_MXC && ARM64
> > +
> > +config PHY_MIXEL_MIPI_DPHY
> > + tristate "Mixel MIPI DSI PHY support"
> > + depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
> > + select GENERIC_PHY
> > + select GENERIC_PHY_MIPI_DPHY
> > + select REGMAP_MMIO
> > + default ARCH_MXC && ARM64
>
> I don't think that this default is a good idea.
>
> There are imx8m systems that do not have display, so in this case it
> does not make sense to always force the build of this driver.
O.k. - we can enable this based on imx-nwl later on. I've also addressed
your other comments. Will wait for a v10 for a couple of days in case
there's more feedback.
Thanks,
-- Guido
Powered by blists - more mailing lists