linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:08:31 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the
 wireless-drivers tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
conflict in:

  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/file.h

between commit:

  b35f63972c5c ("iwlwifi: dbg_ini: check debug TLV type explicitly")

from the wireless-drivers tree and commit:

  aee1b6385e29 ("iwlwifi: support fseq tlv and print fseq version")

from the wireless-drivers-next tree.

I fixed it up (the latter is a superset of the former) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped