lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:55:45 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        gorcunov@...il.com
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arunks@...eaurora.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        mguzik@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] prctl_set_mm: downgrade mmap_sem to read lock

On 30.04.2019 11:18, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Since commit 88aa7cc688d4 ("mm: introduce arg_lock to protect
> arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct") we use arg_lock for
> boundaries modifications. Synchronize prctl_set_mm with this lock and
> keep mmap_sem for reading only (analogous to what we already do in
> prctl_set_mm_map).
> 
> v2: call find_vma without arg_lock held
> 
> CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> CC: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sys.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index e1acb444d7b0..641fda756575 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -2123,9 +2123,14 @@ static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigned long addr,
>  
>  	error = -EINVAL;
>  
> -	down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	/*
> +	 * arg_lock protects concurent updates of arg boundaries, we need mmap_sem for
> +	 * a) concurrent sys_brk, b) finding VMA for addr validation.
> +	 */
> +	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  	vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
>  
> +	spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
>  	prctl_map.start_code	= mm->start_code;
>  	prctl_map.end_code	= mm->end_code;
>  	prctl_map.start_data	= mm->start_data;
> @@ -2213,7 +2218,8 @@ static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigned long addr,
>  
>  	error = 0;
>  out:
> -	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
> +	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  	return error;

Hm, shouldn't spin_lock()/spin_unlock() pair go as a fixup to existing code
in a separate patch? 

Without them, the existing code has a problem at least in get_mm_cmdline().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ