[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190430101608.GB6343@splinter>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:16:10 +0000
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mlxsw: Remove obsolete dependency on THERMAL=m
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The THERMAL configuration option was changed from tristate to bool, but
> a dependency on THERMAL=m was forgotten, leading to a warning when
> running "make savedefconfig":
>
> boolean symbol THERMAL tested for 'm'? test forced to 'n'
>
> Fixes: be33e4fbbea581ea ("thermal/drivers/core: Remove the module Kconfig's option")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
I assume this will be applied to the thermal tree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists