linux-kernel - [PATCH 17/25] iommu/dma: Split iommu_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190430105214.24628-18-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:52:06 -0400
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/25] iommu/dma: Split iommu_dma_free

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

Most of it can double up to serve the failure cleanup path for
iommu_dma_alloc().

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 99dd82d8ae21..9ba35b98506c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -916,15 +916,12 @@ static void iommu_dma_unmap_resource(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
 	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
 }
 
-static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
-		dma_addr_t handle, unsigned long attrs)
+static void __iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr)
 {
 	size_t alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
 	int count = alloc_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	struct page *page = NULL, **pages = NULL;
 
-	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
-
 	/* Non-coherent atomic allocation? Easy */
 	if (dma_free_from_pool(cpu_addr, alloc_size))
 		return;
@@ -949,6 +946,13 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 		__free_pages(page, get_order(alloc_size));
 }
 
+static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
+		dma_addr_t handle, unsigned long attrs)
+{
+	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
+	__iommu_dma_free(dev, size, cpu_addr);
+}
+
 static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs)
 {
-- 
2.20.1