lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:57 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <>
To:     Ludovic Barre <>
Cc:     Rob Herring <>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <>,
        Maxime Coquelin <>,
        Alexandre Torgue <>,
        Linux ARM <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        DTML <>,
        "" <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] mmc: mmci: add busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 09:46, Ludovic Barre <> wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <>
> This patch series adds busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant.
> Some adaptations are required:
> -Avoid to check and poll busy status when is not expected.
> -Clear busy status bit if busy_detect_flag and busy_detect_mask are
>  different.
> -Add hardware busy timeout with MMCIDATATIMER register.
> V2:
> -mmci_cmd_irq cleanup in separate patch.
> -simplify the busy_detect_flag exclude
> -replace sdmmc specific comment in
> "mmc: mmci: avoid fake busy polling in mmci_irq"
> to focus on common behavior
> Ludovic Barre (5):
>   mmc: mmci: cleanup mmci_cmd_irq for busy detect feature
>   mmc: mmci: avoid fake busy polling in mmci_irq
>   mmc: mmci: fix clear of busy detect status
>   mmc: mmci: add hardware busy timeout feature
>   mmc: mmci: add busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> --
> 2.7.4

Ludovic, just wanted to let you know that I am reviewing and testing
this series.

However, while running some tests on Ux500 for validating the busy
detection code, even without your series applied, I encounter some odd
behaviors. I am looking into the problem to understand better and will
let you know as soon as I have some more data to share.

Kind regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists