[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190430113557.087736333@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:38:40 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"chengjian (D)" <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 33/53] sched/deadline: Correctly handle active 0-lag timers
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
commit 1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f upstream.
syzbot reported the following warning:
[ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 17089 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:255 task_non_contending+0xae0/0x1950
line 255 of deadline.c is:
WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer));
in task_non_contending().
Unfortunately, in some cases (for example, a deadline task
continuosly blocking and waking immediately) it can happen that
a task blocks (and task_non_contending() is called) while the
0-lag timer is still active.
In this case, the safest thing to do is to immediately decrease
the running bandwidth of the task, without trying to re-arm the 0-lag timer.
Signed-off-by: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: chengjian (D) <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325131530.34706-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct t
if (dl_se->dl_runtime == 0)
return;
- WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer));
WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending);
zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline -
@@ -234,7 +233,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct t
* If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active
* utilization now, instead of starting a timer
*/
- if (zerolag_time < 0) {
+ if ((zerolag_time < 0) || hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) {
if (dl_task(p))
sub_running_bw(dl_se->dl_bw, dl_rq);
if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists