[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d9fbc1-5956-2b7b-0b9a-6368e378d0f6@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:06:12 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: qcom_scm: Incompatible pointer type build failure
Hi Ian,
Thank you for the report.
On 30/04/2019 13:44, Ian Jackson wrote:
> osstest service owner writes ("[linux-4.19 test] 135420: regressions - FAIL"):
>> flight 135420 linux-4.19 real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/135420/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-armhf-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 129313
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/135420/build-armhf-pvops/6.ts-kernel-build.log
>
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function ‘qcom_scm_assign_mem’:
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:469:47: error: passing argument 3 of ‘dma_alloc_coherent’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
> ^
> In file included from drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:21:0:
> ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:560:21: note: expected ‘dma_addr_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}’ but argument is of type ‘phys_addr_t * {aka unsigned int *}’
> static inline void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:303: recipe for target 'drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.o' failed
> make[2]: *** [drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.o] Error 1
> scripts/Makefile.build:544: recipe for target 'drivers/firmware' failed
> make[1]: *** [drivers/firmware] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> I think this build failure is probably a regression; rather it is due
> to the stretch update which brings in a new compiler.
The bug has always been present (and still present in master), it is possible
the compiler became smarter with the upgrade to stretch.
The problem is similar to [1] and happen when the size of phys_addr_t is
different to dma_addr_t.
I have CCed the maintainers of this file.
Cheers,
[1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-04/msg00940.html
--
Julien Grall
Powered by blists - more mailing lists