[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190430141500.GE23020@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:15:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RT WARNING] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(rt_mutex_owner(lock) !=
current) with fsfreeze (4.19.25-rt16)
Sorry, I don't understand...
On 04/30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Thaw then does the reverse, frobs lockdep
Yes, in particular it does
lockdep_sb_freeze_acquire()
percpu_rwsem_acquire()
sem->rw_sem.owner = current;
> and then does: percpu_up_write().
>
> percpu_up_write() on up_write(). And note how __up_write() has:
>
> DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != current, sem);
and everything looks correct, sem->owner == current by the time
thaw_super_locked() does percpu_up_write/up_write.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists