linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ACPI / device_sysfs: change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 May 2019 09:59:25 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        jank@...ence.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ACPI / device_sysfs: change _ADR
 representation to 64 bits

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/16/19 3:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:29 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15-04-19, 10:18, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>> Standards such as the MIPI DisCo for SoundWire 1.0 specification
> >>> assume the _ADR field is 64 bits.
> >>>
> >>> _ADR is defined as an "Integer" represented as 64 bits since ACPI 2.0
> >>> released in 2002. The low levels already use _ADR as 64 bits, e.g. in
> >>> struct acpi_device_info.
> >>>
> >>> This patch bumps the representation used for sysfs to 64 bits.
> >>>
> >>> Example with a SoundWire device, the results show the complete
> >>> vendorID and linkID which were omitted before:
> >>>
> >>> Before:
> >>> $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
> >>> 0x5d070000
> >>> After:
> >>> $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
> >>> 0x000010025d070000
> >>
> >> This looks fine but the sysfs file is an ABI. Not sure if we can modify
> >> the value returned this way.. Though it should not cause userspace
> >> reading 32bits to break...
> >
> > Well, IIRC using "08" instead of "016" in the format field would
> > preserve the existing behavior for 32-bit values, wouldn't it?
>
> yes, but it makes the 64-bit address not aligned depending on the number
> of leading zeroes, see below. I get a migraine just looking at the results.

Well, scripts reading them won't get that, but fair enough.

> Maybe add a test to use 08 for values that are below 0xFFFFFFFF and 16
> for addresses who really need the full range, typically because of an
> encoding?

That would be fine by me.