[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7235739f-4485-6b6b-e995-7c8bdfab9b28@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 12:37:52 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jason@...edaemon.net, douliyangs@...il.com, robin.murphy@....com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, tglx@...utronix.de, logang@...tatee.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Don't map the MSI page in
its_irq_compose_msi_msg()
On 01/05/2019 12:14, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 30/04/2019 13:34, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thank you for the review!
>
>>
>> On 4/29/19 4:44 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> its_irq_compose_msi_msg() may be called from non-preemptible context.
>>> However, on RT, iommu_dma_map_msi_msg requires to be called from a
>>> preemptible context.
>>>
>>> A recent change split iommu_dma_map_msi_msg() in two new functions:
>>> one that should be called in preemptible context, the other does
>>> not have any requirement.
>>>
>>> The GICv3 ITS driver is reworked to avoid executing preemptible code in
>>> non-preemptible context. This can be achieved by preparing the MSI
>>> maping when allocating the MSI interrupt.
>> mapping
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Rework the commit message to use imperative mood
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> index 7577755bdcf4..12ddbcfe1b1e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> @@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static void its_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *d, struct msi_msg *msg)
>>> msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(addr);
>>> msg->data = its_get_event_id(d);
>>>
>>> - iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(d->irq, msg);
>>> + iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(irq_data_get_msi_desc(d), msg);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int its_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>>> @@ -2566,6 +2566,7 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>>> {
>>> msi_alloc_info_t *info = args;
>>> struct its_device *its_dev = info->scratchpad[0].ptr;
>>> + struct its_node *its = its_dev->its;
>>> irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>>> int err;
>>> int i;
>>> @@ -2574,6 +2575,8 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>>
>>> + err = iommu_dma_prepare_msi(info->desc, its->get_msi_base(its_dev));
>> Test err as in gicv2m driver?
>
> Hmmm yes. Marc, do you want me to respin the patch?
Sure, feel free to if you can. But what I really need is an Ack from
Jorg on the first few patches.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists