[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbf41c1b-21c7-a997-f88c-3d29ccd1b42a@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 07:18:52 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] backlight: lm3630a: add firmware node support
Pavel
On 5/1/19 3:26 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> @@ -396,13 +506,20 @@ static int lm3630a_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (pdata == NULL)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> /* default values */
>>> - pdata->leda_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDA_ENABLE;
>>> - pdata->ledb_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDB_ENABLE;
>>> + pdata->leda_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDA_DISABLE;
>>> + pdata->ledb_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDB_DISABLE;
>>
>> This is not needed since default is disabled and kzalloc will set these to 0
>
> Let compiler do this kind of optimalizations. Code makes sense as-is.
>
Yes the code makes sense but it is unnecessary.
Dan
> Pavel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists