[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89147C5F-4F1D-4E19-AF68-658F6F638B3C@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 13:52:51 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 07/12] x86/fsgsbase/64: Introduce the
FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 02:02, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>> index f5a796da07f8..d063841a17e3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h
>> @@ -306,6 +306,21 @@
>> .endif
>> MODRM 0xc0 movq_r64_xmm_opd1 movq_r64_xmm_opd2
>> .endm
>> +
>> +.macro RDPID opd
>
> So the update to require binutils >= 2.21 does not cover RDPID?
>
I can see RDPID support in 2.27 release. I wonder if we can even require >= 2.27
right now.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists