linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190501130157.27fb69cd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 1 May 2019 13:01:57 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec
 tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:41:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8742dc86d0c7 ("xfrm4: Fix uninitialized memory read in _decode_session4")
> 
> from the ipsec tree and commit:
> 
>   c53ac41e3720 ("xfrm: remove decode_session indirection from afinfo_policy")
> 
> from the ipsec-next tree.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:37:41 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm4: fix up for moved _decode_session4
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index 410233c5681e..7a43ae6b2a44 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -3264,7 +3264,8 @@ static void
>  decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  {
>  	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> -	u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +	int ihl = iph->ihl;
> +	u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  	struct flowi4 *fl4 = &fl->u.ip4;
>  	int oif = 0;
>  
> @@ -3275,6 +3276,11 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  	fl4->flowi4_mark = skb->mark;
>  	fl4->flowi4_oif = reverse ? skb->skb_iif : oif;
>  
> +	fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> +	fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> +	fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> +	fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
> +
>  	if (!ip_is_fragment(iph)) {
>  		switch (iph->protocol) {
>  		case IPPROTO_UDP:
> @@ -3286,7 +3292,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
>  				__be16 *ports;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				ports = (__be16 *)xprth;
>  
>  				fl4->fl4_sport = ports[!!reverse];
> @@ -3298,7 +3304,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 2 - skb->data)) {
>  				u8 *icmp;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				icmp = xprth;
>  
>  				fl4->fl4_icmp_type = icmp[0];
> @@ -3310,7 +3316,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
>  				__be32 *ehdr;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				ehdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>  
>  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ehdr[0];
> @@ -3321,7 +3327,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 8 - skb->data)) {
>  				__be32 *ah_hdr;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				ah_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>  
>  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ah_hdr[1];
> @@ -3332,7 +3338,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			    pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
>  				__be16 *ipcomp_hdr;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				ipcomp_hdr = (__be16 *)xprth;
>  
>  				fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = htonl(ntohs(ipcomp_hdr[1]));
> @@ -3344,7 +3350,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  				__be16 *greflags;
>  				__be32 *gre_hdr;
>  
> -				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> +				xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
>  				greflags = (__be16 *)xprth;
>  				gre_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>  
> @@ -3360,10 +3366,6 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> -	fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> -	fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> -	fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)

This is now a conflict between the net and net-next trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped