linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v3] ftrace/x86_64: Emulate call function while updating in breakpoint handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 May 2019 15:00:25 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3] ftrace/x86_64: Emulate call function while
 updating in breakpoint handler

On Wed, 1 May 2019 20:57:26 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 11:01:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This looks sane to me, although I'm surprised that we didn't already
> > have an annotation for the nonstandard stack frame for asm files. That
> > probably would be cleaner in a separate commit, but I guess it doesn't
> > matter.
> > 
> > Anyway, I'm willing to consider the entry code version if it looks a
> > _lot_ simpler than this (so I'd like to see them side-by-side), but
> > it's not like this looks all that complicated to me either.  
> 
> So I posted one earlier today:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190501131117.GW2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> 
> it's about a 1/3rd the number of lines and has 32bit support. It also
> provides all the bits required to implement static_call().

That's the patch I started with.

> 
> That is; I think I'm firmly in favour of the entry variant -- provided
> it actually works of course.

And it works. I ran it through tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
and it passed as good as without that patch.

I haven't ran it through my full test suite. I can do that and see how
it makes out.

-- Steve