[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190501191324.GU7905@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 21:13:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftrace/x86: Emulate call function while updating in
breakpoint handler
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 12:03:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Here goes, compile tested only...
>
> Ugh, two different threads. This has the same bug (same source) as the
> one Steven posted:
This is what Steve started from; lets continue in the other thread.
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
> > @@ -1479,6 +1479,13 @@ ENTRY(int3)
> > ASM_CLAC
> > pushl $-1 # mark this as an int
> >
> > + testl $SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, PT_CS(%esp)
> > + jnz .Lfrom_usermode_no_gap
> > + .rept 6
> > + pushl 5*4(%esp)
> > + .endr
> > +.Lfrom_usermode_no_gap:
>
> This will corrupt things horribly if you still use vm86 mode. Checking
> CS RPL is simply not correct.
I'll go fix; I never really understood that vm86 crud and I cobbled this
32bit thing together based on the 64bit version (that Josh did a while
ago).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists