[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1556740577-4140-3-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 22:56:16 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] s390: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
The only reason s390 has ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL option in
arch/s390/Kconfig is an ancient compile error with allnoconfig which was
fixed by commit 97195d6b411f ("[S390] fix sparsemem related compile error
with allnoconfig on s390") by adding the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL option.
Since then a lot have changed and now allnoconfig builds just fine without
ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL, so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index b6e3d06..69d3956 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -621,9 +621,6 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
def_bool y
-config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
- def_bool y
-
config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
def_bool y if SPARSEMEM
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists