[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1556751209-4778-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 15:53:29 -0700
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tools/bpf: fix perf build error with uClibc (seen on ARC)
When build perf for ARC recently, there was a build failure due to lack
of __NR_bpf.
| Auto-detecting system features:
|
| ... get_cpuid: [ OFF ]
| ... bpf: [ on ]
|
| # error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
^~~~~
| bpf.c: In function 'sys_bpf':
| bpf.c:66:17: error: '__NR_bpf' undeclared (first use in this function)
| return syscall(__NR_bpf, cmd, attr, size);
| ^~~~~~~~
| sys_bpf
The fix is to define a fallbak __NR_bpf.
The obvious fix with be __arc__ specific value, but i think a better fix
is to use the asm-generic uapi value applicable to ARC as well as any new
arch (hopefully we don't add an old existing arch here). Otherwise I can
just add __arc__
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 9cd015574e83..2c5eb7928400 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -47,7 +47,10 @@
# elif defined(__s390__)
# define __NR_bpf 351
# else
-# error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
+/*
+ * Any non listed arch (new) will have to asm-generic uapi complient
+ */
+# define __NR_bpf 280
# endif
#endif
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists