[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190502165520.GC6565@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 18:55:20 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Remove the _GPL from the kernel_fpu_begin/end()
export
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 09:29:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm not saying that we should export things for ZFS's benefit. But,
> as far as I know, _GPL means "this interface is sufficiently specific
> to Linux details that we think that any user must be a derived work".
> I don't think that kernel_fpu_begin() is an example of that.
But it is sufficiently specific. It is present on x86 and s390 only -
other arches don't have it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists