[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU4czPQ8xxv5efvhkizU3obpV_05VEWYKydXDDDYcp8j=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 19:44:07 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: "Goetz, Patrick G" <pgoetz@...h.utexas.edu>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>,
Patrick Plagwitz <Patrick_Plagwitz@....de>,
"linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: ignore empty NFSv4 ACLs in ext4 upperdir
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 19:27, Goetz, Patrick G <pgoetz@...h.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On 5/1/19 10:57 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Support some day support for nfs4 acls were added to ext4 (not a totally
> > ridiculous suggestion). We would then want NFS to allow it's ACLs to be
> > copied up.
>
> Is there some reason why there hasn't been a greater effort to add NFSv4
> ACL support to the mainstream linux filesystems? I have to support a
> hybrid linux/windows environment and not having these ACLs on ext4 is a
> daily headache for me.
The patches for implementing that have been rejected over and over
again, and nobody is working on them anymore.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists