lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 19:44:07 +0200 From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com> To: "Goetz, Patrick G" <pgoetz@...h.utexas.edu> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>, Patrick Plagwitz <Patrick_Plagwitz@....de>, "linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>, Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: ignore empty NFSv4 ACLs in ext4 upperdir On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 19:27, Goetz, Patrick G <pgoetz@...h.utexas.edu> wrote: > On 5/1/19 10:57 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > Support some day support for nfs4 acls were added to ext4 (not a totally > > ridiculous suggestion). We would then want NFS to allow it's ACLs to be > > copied up. > > Is there some reason why there hasn't been a greater effort to add NFSv4 > ACL support to the mainstream linux filesystems? I have to support a > hybrid linux/windows environment and not having these ACLs on ext4 is a > daily headache for me. The patches for implementing that have been rejected over and over again, and nobody is working on them anymore. Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists