linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACdnJuv1vwi7hgyGb-7a0dKfRhwdXTgj2baxO=qzpB_JJ1a9XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 11:03:08 -0700
From:   Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@...ihalf.com>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:32 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Bartosz Szczepanek wrote:
> > I may be a little late with this comment, but I've just tested these
> > patches on aarch64 platform (from the top of jjs/master) and got
> > kernel panic ("Unable to handle kernel read", full log at the end of
> > mail). I think there's problem with below call to
> > tpm2_calc_event_log_size(), where physical address of efi.tpm_log is
> > passed as (void *) and never remapped:
>
> Not late. This is not part of any PR yet. Thank you for the
> feedback!
>
> Matthew, can you send an updated version of the whole patch set
> with fixes to this issue and also reordering of the includes?

Yes, I'll resend and let's do this again for 5.3.