linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190502181811.GY2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 20:18:11 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:02:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:21 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > TL;DR, on x86_32 kernel->kernel IRET frames are only 3 entries and do
> > not include ESP/SS, so not only wasn't regs->sp setup, if you changed it
> > it wouldn't be effective and corrupt random stack state.
> 
> Indeed, the 32-bit case for same-RPL exceptions/iret is entirely
> different, and I'd forgotten about that.
> 
> And honestly, this makes the 32-bit case much worse. Now the entry
> stack modifications of int3 suddenly affect not just the entry, but
> every exit too.

We could fix this by not using the common exit path on int3; not sure we
want to go there, but that is an option.

> This is _exactly_ the kind of subtle kernel entry/exit code I wanted
> us to avoid.
> 
> And while your code looks kind of ok, it's subtly buggy. This sequence:
> 
> +       pushl   %eax
> +       movl    %esp, %eax
> +
> +       movl    4*4(%eax), %esp         # restore (modified) regs->sp
> +
> +       /* rebuild IRET frame */
> +       pushl   3*4(%eax)               # flags
> +       pushl   2*4(%eax)               # cs
> +       pushl   1*4(%eax)               # ip
> +
> +       andl    $0x0000ffff, 4(%esp)    # clear high CS bits
> +
> +       movl    (%eax), %eax            # restore eax
> 
> looks very wrong to me. When you do that "restore (modified)
> regs->sp", isn't that now resetting %esp to the point where %eax now
> points below the stack? So if we get an NMI in this sequence, that
> will overwrite the parts you are trying to copy from?

ARGH; I knew it was too pretty :/ Yes, something like what you suggest
will be needed, I'll go look at that once my brain recovers a bit from
staring at entry code all day.