[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hsgtwlm5t.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:18 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv\@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] tty: serial: add DT bindings and serial driver for the SiFive FU540 UART
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> writes:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> Looks like Paul has so far only tested this with BBL + FSBL, so I think
>> I'll wait to hear from him how that setup might be different from using
>> OpenSBI + u-boot.
>
> I'd recommend testing the DT patches with BBL and the open-source FSBL.
> That's the traditional way of booting RISC-V Linux systems.
OK, but as you know, not the tradiaional way of booting most other linux
systems. ;)
I'm working on getting RISC-V supported in kernelCI in a fully-automated
way, and I don't currently have the time to add add support for BBL+FSBL
to kernelCI automation tooling, so having u-boot support is the best way
to get support in kernelCI, IMO.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists