[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190502060842.GA4608@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 23:08:43 -0700
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Reber <adrian@...as.de>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, criu@...nvz.org,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 19/27] timens/fs/proc: Introduce
/proc/pid/timens_offsets
Hi Jann,
Thank you for the review. Here are a few comments inline.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:16:41PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:15 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com> wrote:
> > API to set time namespace offsets for children processes, i.e.:
> > echo "clockid off_ses off_nsec" > /proc/self/timens_offsets
> [...]
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> > index 6a803a0b75df..76d58e9b5178 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> [...]
> > @@ -1521,6 +1522,103 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_pid_sched_autogroup_operations = {
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TIME_NS
> > +static int timens_offsets_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = m->private;
> > + struct task_struct *p;
> > +
> > + p = get_proc_task(inode);
>
> (FYI, this could also be "p = get_proc_task(file_inode(m->file));".
> But this works, too.)
>
> > + if (!p)
> > + return -ESRCH;
> > + proc_timens_show_offsets(p, m);
> > +
> > + put_task_struct(p);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t
> > +timens_offsets_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > + struct proc_timens_offset offsets[2];
> > + char *kbuf = NULL, *pos, *next_line;
> > + struct task_struct *p;
> > + int ret, noffsets;
> > +
> > + /* Only allow < page size writes at the beginning of the file */
> > + if ((*ppos != 0) || (count >= PAGE_SIZE))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* Slurp in the user data */
> > + kbuf = memdup_user_nul(buf, count);
> > + if (IS_ERR(kbuf))
> > + return PTR_ERR(kbuf);
> > +
> > + /* Parse the user data */
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + noffsets = 0;
> > + pos = kbuf;
> > + for (; pos; pos = next_line) {
> > + struct proc_timens_offset *off = &offsets[noffsets];
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /* Find the end of line and ensure I don't look past it */
> > + next_line = strchr(pos, '\n');
> > + if (next_line) {
> > + *next_line = '\0';
> > + next_line++;
> > + if (*next_line == '\0')
> > + next_line = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = sscanf(pos, "%u %lld %lu", &off->clockid,
> > + &off->val.tv_sec, &off->val.tv_nsec);
> > + if (err != 3 || off->val.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
> > + goto out;
> > + if (noffsets++ == ARRAY_SIZE(offsets))
> > + break;
>
> This is equivalent to:
>
> if (noffsets == ARRAY_SIZE(offsets)) {
noffsets++;
> break;
}
> noffsets++;
>
> So we can reach the start of the loop with
> noffsets==ARRAY_SIZE(offsets), right? Which means that an
> out-of-bounds write can happen?
good catch. I will add a test for this case.
>
> I think that for code like this, it makes sense to write the increment
> and the check out separately so that it's easier to spot problems;
> e.g. like this:
>
> noffsets++;
> if (noffsets == ARRAY_SIZE(offsets))
> break;
will rewrite this way. Thanks!
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = -ESRCH;
> > + p = get_proc_task(inode);
> > + if (!p)
> > + goto out;
> > + ret = proc_timens_set_offset(p, offsets, noffsets);
> > + put_task_struct(p);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ret = count;
> > +out:
> > + kfree(kbuf);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int timens_offsets_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = single_open(filp, timens_offsets_show, NULL);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + struct seq_file *m = filp->private_data;
> > +
> > + m->private = inode;
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> Why did you write it like this? Wouldn't the following be equivalent?
Probably I looked at sched_autogroup_open
>
> static int timens_offsets_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> return single_open(file, timens_offsets_show, inode);
> }
>
> (But also, you can reach the inode of a seq_file as file_inode(m->file).)
>
> [...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/time_namespace.c b/kernel/time_namespace.c
> > index e806accc4eaf..9ad4b63c4ed2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time_namespace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time_namespace.c
> [...]
> > +
> > +int proc_timens_set_offset(struct task_struct *p,
> > + struct proc_timens_offset *offsets, int noffsets)
> > +{
> > + struct ns_common *ns;
> > + struct time_namespace *time_ns;
> > + struct timens_offsets *ns_offsets;
> > + struct timespec64 *offset;
> > + struct timespec64 tp;
> > + int i, err;
> > +
> > + ns = timens_for_children_get(p);
> > + if (!ns)
> > + return -ESRCH;
> > + time_ns = to_time_ns(ns);
> > +
> > + if (!time_ns->offsets || time_ns->initialized ||
> > + !ns_capable(time_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_TIME)) {
>
> Capability checks in VFS read/write handlers are bad. Please pass
> through the file pointer to this function and replace the call with
> "file_ns_capable(file, time_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_TIME)".
Will fix. Thanks!
>
> > + put_time_ns(time_ns);
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> [...]
> > +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists