[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dec53053-fa42-7b9d-14c1-61357e1ecc66@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 10:57:22 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/10] arm64: unbreak DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y build with clang
On 30/04/2019 20.22, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:32 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:06 PM Rasmus Villemoes
>> <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Current versions of clang does not like the %c modifier in inline
>>> assembly for targets other than x86, so any DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y build
>>> fails on arm64. A fix is likely to land in 9.0 (see
>>> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/456), but unbreak the
>>> build for older versions.
>>>
>>> Fixes: arm64: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
>>> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>>> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>>> ---
>>> Andrew, please apply and/or fold into 9/10.
Andrew, friendly ping.
>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> index d0871d523d5d..315992e33b17 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ config ARM64
>>> select CRC32
>>> select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
>>> select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
>>> - select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
>>> + select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS if CC_IS_GCC || CLANG_VERSION >= 90000
>>
>> I just landed the fix for this in Clang, I think around the time you
>> sent the patch. Should ship in Clang 9. Thanks for unbreaking our
>> build.
Sorry for breaking it in the first place :-/
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists