[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB6479F3EED50613DF8F041713E3340@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 09:13:58 +0000
From: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
"nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
"Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V4] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function
Hi Mark
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 02:24:54AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > Add pm runtime support and move clock handling there.
> > Close the clocks at suspend to reduce the power consumption.
> >
> > fsl_esai_suspend is replaced by pm_runtime_force_suspend.
> > fsl_esai_resume is replaced by pm_runtime_force_resume.
>
> This doesn't apply against for-5.2 again. Sorry about this, I think this one is
> due to some messups with my scripts which caused some patches to be
> dropped for a while (and it's likely to be what happened the last time as
> well). Can you check and resend again please? Like I say sorry about this, I
> think it's my mistake.
I am checking, but I don't know why this patch failed in your side. I
Tried to apply this patch on for-5.1, for 5.2, for-linus and for-next, all are
Successful. The git is git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git.
I can't reproduce your problem. Is there any my operation wrong?
Best regards
Wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists