linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: actions: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <315de620-b638-aea4-d8d2-e00f5a493625@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:36 +0200
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: actions: Use the correct style for SPDX License
 Identifier

Am 02.05.19 um 09:07 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:20:44PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> + linux-actions
>>
>> Am 01.05.19 um 09:07 schrieb Nishad Kamdar:
>>> This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style
>>> in header files related to Clock Drivers for Actions Semi Socs.
>>> For C header files Documentation/process/license-rules.rst
>>> mandates C-like comments (opposed to C source files where
>>> C++ style should be used)
>> [...]
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-common.h       | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-composite.h    | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-divider.h      | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.h       | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-fixed-factor.h | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-gate.h         | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-mux.h          | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.h          | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-reset.h        | 2 +-
>>>  9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> Where's the practical benefit of this patch? These are all private
>> headers used from C files, so they can handle C++ comments just fine,
>> otherwise we would've seen build failures.
> 
> Please read Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, the section
> entitled "Style", for what the documented formats are for SPDX lines,
> depending on the file type.

That does in no way answer my question! You conveniently dropped my
paragraph indicating that I understand why we would do that for public
headers in include/, but none of these private headers here are included
in .lds files. So there really seems to be no benefit of switching from
one style to another for in-tree code.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)