[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6af5ddb7-75ad-7d3f-b303-f6f06adb1bf0@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 11:53:34 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger.pro@...il.com" <eric.auger.pro@...il.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@...aro.org" <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Vincent Stehle <Vincent.Stehle@....com>,
"ashok.raj@...el.com" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <Christoffer.Dall@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/23] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API
On 02/05/2019 07:58, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jean-Philippe,
>
> On 5/1/19 12:38 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> On 08/04/2019 13:18, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> +int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>>> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + ret = domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, inv_info);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>
>> Nit: you don't really need ret
>>
>> The UAPI looks good to me, so
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
> Just to make sure, do you accept changes proposed by Jacob in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/29/659 ie.
> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_INVAL_GRANU in enum iommu_inv_granularity and
> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_CACHE_TYPE
Ah sorry, I forgot about that, I'll review the next version. Yes they
can be useful (maybe call them IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR and
IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR?). I guess it's legal to export in UAPI values
that will change over time, as VFIO also does it in its enums.
Thanks,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists