linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.1-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190502161758.26972bb2@mschwideX1>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 16:17:58 +0200
From:   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1-rc5

On Thu, 2 May 2019 14:21:28 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:19 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Can we please have the page refcount overflow fixes out on the list
> > > for review, even if it is after the fact?  
> > 
> > They were actually on a list for review long before the fact, but it
> > was the security mailing list. The issue actually got discussed back
> > in January along with early versions of the patches, but then we
> > dropped the ball because it just wasn't on anybody's radar and it got
> > resurrected late March. Willy wrote a rather bigger patch-series, and
> > review of that is what then resulted in those commits. So they may
> > look recent, but that's just because the original patches got
> > seriously edited down and rewritten.
> > 
> > That said, powerpc and s390 should at least look at maybe adding a
> > check for the page ref in their gup paths too. Powerpc has the special
> > gup_hugepte() case, and s390 has its own version of gup entirely. I
> > was actually hoping the s390 guys would look at using the generic gup
> > code.
> > 
> > I ruthlessly also entirely ignored MIPS, SH and sparc, since they seem
> > largely irrelevant, partly since even theoretically this whole issue
> > needs a _lot_ of memory.
> > 
> > Michael, Martin, see commit 6b3a70773630 ("Merge branch 'page-refs'
> > (page ref overflow)"). You may or may not really care.  
> 
> I've now queued these patches up for the next round of stable releases,
> as some people seem to care about these.
> 
> I didn't see any follow-on patches for s390 or ppc64 hit the tree for
> these changes, am I just missing them and should also queue up a few
> more to handle this issue on those platforms?

I fixed that with a different approach. The following two patches are
queued for the next merge window:

d1874a0c2805 "s390/mm: make the pxd_offset functions more robust"
1a42010cdc26 "s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast code"

With these two s390 now uses the generic gup code in mm/gup.c

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.