linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 034/101] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Take the srcu lock when parsing the memslots

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190502143341.907649458@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  2 May 2019 17:20:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        "Sasha Levin (Microsoft)" <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 034/101] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Take the srcu lock when parsing the memslots

[ Upstream commit 7494cec6cb3ba7385a6a223b81906384f15aae34 ]

Calling kvm_is_visible_gfn() implies that we're parsing the memslots,
and doing this without the srcu lock is frown upon:

[12704.164532] =============================
[12704.164544] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[12704.164560] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #16 Tainted: G        W
[12704.164573] -----------------------------
[12704.164589] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[12704.164602] other info that might help us debug this:
[12704.164616] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[12704.164631] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/13968:
[12704.164644]  #0: 000000007ebdae4f (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0
[12704.164691]  #1: 000000007d751022 (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0
[12704.164726]  #2: 00000000219d2706 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[12704.164761]  #3: 00000000a760aecd (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[12704.164794]  #4: 000000000ef8e31d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[12704.164827]  #5: 000000007a872093 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[12704.164861] stack backtrace:
[12704.164878] CPU: 2 PID: 13968 Comm: qemu-system-aar Tainted: G        W         5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #16
[12704.164887] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019
[12704.164896] Call trace:
[12704.164910]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x138
[12704.164920]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[12704.164934]  dump_stack+0xbc/0x104
[12704.164946]  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110
[12704.164958]  gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190
[12704.164969]  kvm_is_visible_gfn+0x28/0x70
[12704.164980]  vgic_its_check_id.isra.0+0xec/0x1e8
[12704.164991]  vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x1ac/0x330
[12704.165001]  vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0
[12704.165012]  kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8
[12704.165022]  kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8
[12704.165035]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960
[12704.165045]  ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0
[12704.165055]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
[12704.165067]  el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138
[12704.165078]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[12704.165089]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Make sure the lock is taken when doing this.

Fixes: bf308242ab98 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock")
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin (Microsoft) <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index c41e11fd841c..fcb2fceaa4a5 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -754,8 +754,9 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id,
 	u64 indirect_ptr, type = GITS_BASER_TYPE(baser);
 	phys_addr_t base = GITS_BASER_ADDR_48_to_52(baser);
 	int esz = GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE(baser);
-	int index;
+	int index, idx;
 	gfn_t gfn;
+	bool ret;
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE:
@@ -782,7 +783,8 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id,
 
 		if (eaddr)
 			*eaddr = addr;
-		return kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn);
+
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/* calculate and check the index into the 1st level */
@@ -812,7 +814,12 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id,
 
 	if (eaddr)
 		*eaddr = indirect_ptr;
-	return kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn);
+
+out:
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&its->dev->kvm->srcu);
+	ret = kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn);
+	srcu_read_unlock(&its->dev->kvm->srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int vgic_its_alloc_collection(struct vgic_its *its,
-- 
2.19.1