lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 02 May 2019 11:48:21 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <>
To:     prakhar srivastava <>
        linux-security-module <>,
        Paul Moore <>,
        Casey Schaufler <>,
        John Johansen <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec_buffer measure

[Cc'ing Paul, John, Casey]

On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 20:18 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> [Cc'ing LSM mailing list]
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:30 -0700, prakhar srivastava wrote:
> > 2) Adding a LSM hook
> > We are doing both the command line and kernel version measurement in IMA.
> > Can you please elaborate on how this can be used outside of the scenario?
> > That will help me come back with a better design and code. I am
> > neutral about this.
> As I said previously, initially you might want to only measure the
> kexec boot command line, but will you ever want to verify or audit log
> the boot command line hash?  Perhaps LSMs would be interested in the
> boot command line.  Should this be an LSM hook?

>From an LSM perspective, is there any interest in the boot command line?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists