linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1905021749060.929@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 18:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:   David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
To:     Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done
 flag and write

On Thu, 2 May 2019, Scott Bauer wrote:

> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 01:20:56AM +0200, David Kozub wrote:
>>
>> Jonas Rabenstein (3):
>>   block: sed-opal: add ioctl for done-mark of shadow mbr
>>   block: sed-opal: ioctl for writing to shadow mbr
>>   block: sed-opal: check size of shadow mbr
>>
>>  block/opal_proto.h            |  16 ++++
>>  block/sed-opal.c              | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/linux/sed-opal.h      |   2 +
>>  include/uapi/linux/sed-opal.h |  20 +++++
>>  4 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I'll review this over the weekend. Is this essentially the same thing
> we reviewed a month or two ago or are there little differences due to
> it be split across two different series?

The first patch (block: sed-opal: add ioctl for done-mark of shadow mbr) 
is a bit different because a new struct and enum were introduced. The rest 
is pretty much the same. That's also why I kept the reviewd-by tags.

Best regards,
David