linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8516: register ADDA DAI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 15:11:11 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8516: register ADDA DAI

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:12:14PM +0200, Fabien Parent wrote:

> This patch depends on patch serie:
> 	[PATCH 0/5] ASoC: mediatek: Add basic PCM driver for MT8516
> 
> v2:
> 	* Register ADDA before memif to fix ordering issue.

This is v2 of a single patch which depends on an in review patch series?
Please don't do things like this, it makes it much more confusing to
follow what's going on - unless there's some strong reason to do
otherwise it's better to either wait for the existing patch series to be
reviewed or to resend the whole thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)