linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: Fix tag set memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <681b2cba-4442-ae9a-5a3c-461c384198bd@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 09:29:47 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     avri.altman@....com, djkurtz@...omium.org, zwisler@...omium.org,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Fix tag set memory leak

On 2/05/19 10:07 PM, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> The tag set is allocated in mmc_init_queue but never freed. This results
> in a memory leak. This change makes sure we free the tag set when the
> queue is also freed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>

One comment below, otherwise:

Fixes: 81196976ed94 ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>

> ---
> I found this using kmemleak and plugging and unplugging an SD card in a
> few times.
> 
> Here is an example of the output of kmemleak:
> unreferenced object 0xffff888125be4ce8 (size 8):
>   comm "kworker/1:0", pid 17, jiffies 4294901575 (age 204.773s)
>   hex dump (first 8 bytes):
>     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                          ........
>   backtrace:
>     [<0000000061cb8887>] blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0xe9/0x234
>     [<00000000cf532a0f>] mmc_init_queue+0xa9/0x2f0
>     [<000000001e085171>] mmc_blk_alloc_req+0x125/0x2f9
>     [<00000000eae1bd01>] mmc_blk_probe+0x1e2/0x6c1
>     [<00000000a0b4a87d>] really_probe+0x1bd/0x3b0
>     [<00000000e58f3eb9>] driver_probe_device+0xe1/0x115
>     [<00000000358f3b3c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x89/0xac
>     [<00000000ef52ccbe>] __device_attach+0xb0/0x14a
>     [<00000000c9daafa7>] bus_probe_device+0x33/0x9f
>     [<0000000008ac5779>] device_add+0x34b/0x5e2
>     [<00000000b42623cc>] mmc_add_card+0x1f5/0x20d
>     [<00000000f114ebc3>] mmc_attach_sd+0xc5/0x14b
>     [<000000006e915e0d>] mmc_rescan+0x261/0x2b6
>     [<00000000e5b49c26>] process_one_work+0x1d3/0x31f
>     [<0000000068c8cd3c>] worker_thread+0x1cd/0x2bf
>     [<00000000326e2e22>] kthread+0x14f/0x157
> 
> Once I applied this patch the leak went away.
> 
> p.s., I included a small white space fix. Hope that's ok.

Not really.  For example, the patch does not apply cleanly to stable trees
only because of that chunk.

> 
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index 7c364a9c4eeb..176a08748cf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card)
>  
>  	mq->card = card;
>  	mq->use_cqe = host->cqe_enabled;
> -	
> +
>  	spin_lock_init(&mq->lock);
>  
>  	memset(&mq->tag_set, 0, sizeof(mq->tag_set));
> @@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ void mmc_cleanup_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq)
>  		blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
>  
>  	blk_cleanup_queue(q);
> +	blk_mq_free_tag_set(&mq->tag_set);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * A request can be completed before the next request, potentially
>