[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190503073550.GB15740@linux>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 09:35:50 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:55:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Towards enabling memory hotplug to track partial population of a
> section, introduce 'struct mem_section_usage'.
>
> A pointer to a 'struct mem_section_usage' instance replaces the existing
> pointer to a 'pageblock_flags' bitmap. Effectively it adds one more
> 'unsigned long' beyond the 'pageblock_flags' (usemap) allocation to
> house a new 'map_active' bitmap. The new bitmap enables the memory
> hot{plug,remove} implementation to act on incremental sub-divisions of a
> section.
>
> The primary motivation for this functionality is to support platforms
> that mix "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory" within a single section,
> or multiple PMEM ranges with different mapping lifetimes within a single
> section. The section restriction for hotplug has caused an ongoing saga
> of hacks and bugs for devm_memremap_pages() users.
>
> Beyond the fixups to teach existing paths how to retrieve the 'usemap'
> from a section, and updates to usemap allocation path, there are no
> expected behavior changes.
>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists