[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQH8v8_HG6-cytT4qe05W9iiYwEP1mud4zG2NxxYcFptQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 19:36:35 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 05/11] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: add initializer
to avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized
Hi Miquel,
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:14 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote on Tue, 23 Apr
> 2019 12:49:53 +0900:
>
> > This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common
> > place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand.
> >
> > Kbuild test robot has never reported -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
> > for this probably because vf610_nfc_run() is inlined by the x86
> > compiler's inlining heuristic.
> >
> > If CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is enabled for a different architecture
> > and vf610_nfc_run() is not inlined, the following warning is reported:
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c: In function ‘vf610_nfc_cmd’:
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:455:3: warning: ‘offset’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > vf610_nfc_rd_from_sram(instr->ctx.data.buf.in + offset,
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > nfc->regs + NFC_MAIN_AREA(0) + offset,
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > trfr_sz, !nfc->data_access);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> IMHO this patch has no dependencies with this series.
This patch is the prerequisite for 11/11.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1064959/
Without the correct patch order,
the kbuild test robot reports the warning.
> Would you mind sending it alone with the proper Fixes tag?
I do not think Fixes is necessary.
Nobody has noticed this potential issue before.
Without 11/11, probably we cannot reproduce this warning.
BTW, this series has been for a while in linux-next.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3: None
> > Changes in v2:
> > - split into a separate patch
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> > index a662ca1970e5..19792d725ec2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_cmd(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > {
> > const struct nand_op_instr *instr;
> > struct vf610_nfc *nfc = chip_to_nfc(chip);
> > - int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset;
> > + int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset = 0;
> > u32 col = 0, row = 0, cmd1 = 0, cmd2 = 0, code = 0;
> > bool force8bit = false;
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists