lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1905031440570.10635@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 14:42:18 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>
cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fix devm_add_action_or_reset() parameter

On Fri, 3 May 2019, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:

> >> -	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, &rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
> >> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
> > Why do you think this is wrong C?
> 
> Because I was not aware that both func and &func refer to the same 
> function pointer.
> 
> Now I know :)

Yup, it's defined in 6.3.2.1.4 in C99.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ