[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10184ec0-008c-f9a5-a043-0fe0ce211e4d@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 15:28:27 +0000
From: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: mm: Do not use set_{pud,pmd}_safe when splitting
the large page
Hi Boris,
On 4/17/19 12:24 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
...
>
> The comment here is missing one key point:
> kernel_physical_mapping_init() can only be used to populate non-present
> entries. It kinda infers that from "Create...", but I really think we
> need to be explicit.
>
> Anyway, it's better than it was, and it does fix a bug, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>
> But please flesh out that comment if you do another version for some reason.
>
Can you please pick this patch? Or do you want me to resend it ?
It's fixing a bug seen in SEV guest.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists